University of Chicago Faculty Blog: Randy Picker poses two interesting hypothetical questions relevant to the Google Book Search project (formerly Google Print) that are designed to question the protections of derivative works and the boundaries of fair use.
The first hypothetical Picker proposes is the “Google Index,” which is where humans read books, create indexes (just like those normally located in the back of a text), and then enter these indexes into a Google searchable database. The result of searching Google Index does not provide snippets of text, but “would return just the basic info on the book—author, title, ISBN and perhaps a link to Amazon to buy the book—and the page number relevant to the search, just like a paper index.”
The second approach, “Google Digital Index,” is the same as Google Index except that “Google takes physical copies of the books, digitizes them, sics high-end software on the digital copies, [produces an index for the books, and then destroys the digital copies.]” As before, “a search on Google Digital Index generates only author/title/ISBN info and the page number in the physical book relevant to the search.”
Based on these hypotheticals, Picker ends the post with three specific questions:
“Is the index a derivative work? Does the presence of interim copies in the second version matter . . . ? Does the fair use analysis change if page numbers are returned as a search result rather than limited amounts of actual text plus page numbers as in the snippet view?”