« April 2006 | Main | June 2006 »

May 30, 2006

Section 119 Licensing & Injunctions

CBS Broadcasting, Inc. v. Echostar Communications Corp. (11th Circ. May 23, 2006)

Pages upon pages of this opinion describe in detail Echostar’s consistent pattern of behavior violating Section 119 of the Copyright Act. The Satellite Home Viewer Act of 1988 created Section 119 and it governs the statutory licensing of traditional television broadcasts to satellite television providers. The nature of the dispute here involved Echostar’s methods of determining whether its customers could receive television broadcasts as “`unserved households,’ that is, households unable to receive network programming at a specified level of intensity through the use of conventional rooftop antennas.”

On appeal, the central question was whether Echostar’s failures to comply with the statute represents “repeated individual violations” or a “pattern or practice” of violations. The district court had concluded on the former, thereby avoiding a permanent nationwide injunction required by the statute. Relying on legislative intent and public policy arguments, the appeals court disagreed with the district court. Whereas the district court had assumed that Section 119 required ongoing disobedience, the appeals court concluded that “for the purpose of evaluating “pattern or practice” liability, that a finding that a satellite carrier failed to carry its burden of establishing eligibility is tantamount to a finding of ineligibility.” Further, the evidence on the record was sufficient for the appeals court to order that the case be remanded to the district court with instructions to issue the permanent nationwide injunction required by Section 119.

Chinese Copyright Reform

People's Daily Online:

The Chinese government has passed a new regulation to ban the uploading and downloading of Internet material without the copyright holder's permission.

Under the regulation, effective from July 1, anyone uploading texts, and performance, sound and video recordings to the Internet for downloading, copying or other use, must acquire the permission of the copyright owners and pay the required fee.

The production, import and supply of devices that are capable of evading or breaching technical measures of copyright protection and technical services are prohibited under the regulation.

(Click Here For More)

May 29, 2006

Blog Update

I just moved to Manhattan for June and July, so my usual level of coverage was disrupted by the usual hassles of moving to a new location. Things should speed up back to normal now that I have network access once again.

May 26, 2006

Kanye West Raps In Court

USA Today:

Kanye West gave an impromptu performance of the 2003 hit Stand Up at a copyright infringement trial, causing a judge to blush and drawing a laugh from jurors.
During West's testimony on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel asked him to say the first two lines of Stand Up, the song for which he created the beat and opening two lines before top-selling rapper Ludacris finished it.

West hesitated but finally blurted out a line laced with a harsh profanity that struck the judge as out of place in the dignified Manhattan courtroom.

"I'm sorry I asked," the blushing judge said with a chuckle as nearly everyone in the courtroom, including the jurors, laughed out loud. "I think I'm going to withdraw my question."

(Click Here For More)

May 25, 2006

Studios File Suit Against Cablevision's "Network DVR"

Ars Technica:

Concerns over copyright are being brought before a judge in a move that could once again subject innovation to the whims of the entertainment industry. At the center of the debate is Cablevision's "remote storage" DVR, which has also been called a "network DVR" in some circles. The device is like other DVRs in that it allows users to digitally record TV shows as well as pause live TV, but there's a twist: rather than store the content in the DVR, Comcast plans to store it at a central facility, and stream content over their network. The plans were announced in March of this year, and within a few short weeks it became clear that Cablevision was in for a showdown with the TV and premium cable networks.

ABC, NBC, CBS, 20th Century Fox, Universal, Paramount and Disney joined together to request an injunction against Cablevision's plans, filing in the US District Court in Manhattan.

(Click Here For More)

May 24, 2006

Protests And Other Thoughts About DRM

Recently, DRM Protestors staged a surprise demonstration at a Windows Hardware Engineering Conference , succeeding to the extent that they even disrupted Bill Gate's keynote. Further details, including pictures of the demonstrators in HazMat suits, is available at boingboing.com.

In response to these demonstrations, Randy Picker has a new post on the University of Chicago Faculty Blog about DRM and its relationship to the history of asymmetrical vs. symmetrical copying costs. Picker's primary point is that:

"[W]e can use technology and design to help enforce laws. Doing so involves lots of choices, but the fact that limits are imposed hardly makes the products defective by design. We need to decide what rules we want—about speed limits and about control over copies—and then figure out ways to make those rules work in actual practice.

For further perspective on DRM and its regulation, readers may also wish to look at David Berlind's editorial, which may not in itself be a response to the protests but is nonetheless appropriate to consider here. David Berlind is no fan of DRM, which he refers to as C.R.A.P., but he takes the position that if DRM is here to stay that at least it could "have the decency to disclose to us sheeple [sic] what it's capable of doing or enabling." In particular, while Berlind does not go so far as to suggest imposing legal mandates about DRM, Berlind strongly advocates that DRM providers should be publicly transparent about the types of services they offer to both content providers and consumers.

Rap Stars In Court

Reuters:

A federal courtroom was transformed into a rhythmic hip-hop battlefield on Tuesday with jurors bobbing their heads in a copyright trial pitting a New Jersey group against rappers Ludacris and Kanye West.

Music group I.O.F. claims Christopher "Ludacris" Bridges and Grammy award winner Kanye West breached copyright laws by stealing lyrics and style from the little-known group's song "Straight Like That," using it for their 2003 hit single "Stand Up."

(Click Here For More)

Malaysia To Set Up Special Courts

Telecom Asia Daily:

The Malaysian government is planning to establish a special court to handle complaints on infringement of copyright and trademark, an AFP report said.

The report said the move was triggered by trade talks with the US, which earlier said that Malaysia had to do "a lot more" to battle piracy and protect intellectual property right ahead of negotiations for an free-trade agreement due to begin next month.

(Click Here For More)

One-the-Spot Fines For Piracy

The Advertiser:

[Australian state] and federal police will have the power to issue on-the-spot fines to hawkers of pirated DVDs and compact discs under new laws.

Sellers of pirated albums and movies could also be forced to pay back the money they make through sales of unlicensed material. The measures are part of a large package of changes to copyright laws to be introduced to Federal Parliament by Attorney-General Philip Ruddock this year.

Police would have the power to issue a fine to someone they believed had committed copyright piracy. The proposed fine would be $1320. If the matter went to court, a fine of between $6600 and $93,500 could be imposed.

(Click Here For More)

May 23, 2006

Digital Download Service Goes DRM Free

Ars Technica:

The Holy Grail of online music sales is the ability to offer iPod-compatible tracks. Like the quest for the mythical cup itself, the search for iPod compatibility has been largely fruitless for Apple's competitors, whose DRM schemes are incompatible with the iconic music player. For a music store that wants to succeed, reaching the iPod audience is all but a necessity in the the US market, where Apple products account for 78 percent of the total players sold. Perhaps that's why eMusic CEO David Pakman sounds downright gleeful when he points out that "there's only two companies in the world that can sell to them—Apple and eMusic."
(Click Here For More)

Google Search

Recent Posts

June 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30